12-year-old Faisal, an ace badminton player, belongs to a family of carpet weavers. When denied permission to attend a summer training camp because he had to help his family weave, his school coach, Mr. Ansari, stepped in to persuade the family to allow Faisal to strive at bettering his game rather than labour at the carpet workshop.
Ansari’s efforts were slighted by a gruff father who reasoned for his refusal with: “He’s going to have to weave for a living anyway. He may as well start early.” A chafed Ansari charged Faisal’s family with perpetrating child labour.
His allegations were contested with the defense enumerating provisions that allow children “to help their family or family enterprise after school hours or during vacations.”
“It seems like the perfect set-up for children to work under the façade of ‘helping’.”
Ansari continued, “Any work that deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development amounts to child labour. If we don’t let Faisal play and advance his capacity for the sport, his talent will lay untapped and suppressed. He doesn’t belong in a carpet weaving workshop. He belongs in a badminton court! The frustration from not being where he belongs might even cause his mind to be disturbed, leave aside stunting physical growth.”
“And if we want our children to feel free, we need a blanket ban on such unfavourable practices. It’s not wrong to learn a skill. But it is wrong to impose it on a child, who’d much rather do something else, for commercial purposes.”
Khaled Hosseini once wrote, “There are a lot of children…but little childhood.”
Well, this sure shouldn’t be a timeless truth.
Until the verdict,
This is Solomon Naidu.
Reporting from Courtroom No. 5
Of The Bombay High Court.
DISCLAIMER: The content on this website is merely an opinion and not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, organisation, company or individual. Nothing contained herein shall to any extent substitute for the independent investigations and sound judgment of the reader. While we have made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content contained herein, no warranty or guarantee, express or implied, is given with respect to the same. The SHOUT! Network is neither liable nor responsible to any person or entity for any errors or omissions, or for any offense caused from such content.
In addition to the above, thoughts and opinions change from time to time… we consider this a necessary consequence of having an open mind. This website is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot and manifestation of the various topics running around our brains, and as such any thoughts and opinions expressed within out-of-date posts may not be the same, or even similar, to those we may hold today.
Feel free to challenge us, disagree with us, or tell us we’re completely nuts in the comments section of each piece. The SHOUT! Network reserves the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever (abusive, profane, rude, or anonymous comments) – but do SHOUT! with us, if you will.
DISCLAIMER: The content in this blog post is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship. Nothing contained herein should be construed as professional legal advice from The SHOUT! Network or as substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content contained herein without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate jurisdiction. Whilst we endeavour to ensure the accuracy, applicability and completeness of the content on the website; no warranty or guarantee, express or implied, is given with respect to the same and The SHOUT! Network does not accept any liability arising directly or indirectly from any use of the content.